Capital One Sues Customers Illegally

By PHIL MULKINS World Action Line Editor

Published: 1/8/2012  2:22 AM

Dear Action Line: I filed Chapter 7 bankruptcy as I could not make minimum payments on $15,000 in Capital One Financial credit card debt. The payment was $300 per month until they raised it to $750 per month! This I could not afford, so I filed bankruptcy. It wrote saying it was suing me for $15,000. What about bankruptcy court? – D.W., Tulsa.

 ”Personal bankruptcy” frees filers from debts owed to lenders and pursuit by debt collectors. Capital One Financial, the 10th-largest U.S. bank, one of the largest credit-card issuers and best known for its pitch, “What’s in your wallet?” ignored bankruptcy laws.

 A Dec. 23 Wall Street Journal MONEY article (tulsaworld.com/CapitalOneCollections), says late in 2008, the bank was forced to write off $2.9 billion in uncollectible loans. When customers fall behind on payments, rather than outsourcing debt collection to professional debt collectors, Capital One relies on its own employees to make the calls but apparently makes little effort keeping track of bankruptcy filings.

 In 2009, a 35-year-old Hawthorne, N.J., waitress concluded her Chapter 7 bankruptcy case and was sued by Capital One for $4,266 in credit-card debt that had been discharged in bankruptcy. She sued the bank for ignoring bankruptcy law, and Capital One dropped its suit. Capital One asked a bankruptcy judge to throw out her suit, but he refused.

 This wasn’t the first time the bank had gone after its customers for debts discharged in bankruptcy, “even though the practice is illegal.” A court-appointed auditor concluded Capital One pursued 15,500 “erroneous claims” seeking money previously erased by a bankruptcy-court judge and 800 of those borrowers filed lawsuits or other legal actions against Capital One, the auditor said in a Dec. 6, 2011, court filing. Without admitting or denying wrongdoing, Capital One agreed to reimburse about 130 borrowers, lawyers and bankruptcy trustees for legal costs incurred trying to fend off Capital One.

 Also in the Journal, “In 2008, a U.S. bankruptcy trustee in Massachusetts accused Capital One of illegally making 5,600 attempts to collect debts already discharged in bankruptcy.” Capital One was itself saved from bankruptcy in 2008 when it received a $3.55 billion taxpayer bailout in the Treasury Department’s “Capital Purchase Program.”

 The U.S. Department of Justice’s U.S. Trustee Program (federal bankruptcy court), announced a conclusion Jan. 18, 2011, tulsaworld.com/DOJonCOFsuits The program is the DOJ component protecting the integrity of the bankruptcy system overseeing case administration and litigating to enforce bankruptcy laws. “The auditor’s report to the bankruptcy court, after examining 700,000 claims by Capital One, found it ‘erroneously filed’ 15,500 claims for $24.7 million for debts previously discharged in bankruptcy. The bank received $2.35 million on 5,100 of those claims. Refunds to affected consumers or bankruptcy estates will be based on amounts paid to it as a result of such claims. Reimbursement of attorneys’ fees and costs will be based on amounts paid by consumers to counsel or cost incurred by the bankruptcy trustee to object to Capital One’s erroneous claims. Affected consumers and bankruptcy trustees will receive further information from the auditor. Consumers and bankruptcy trustees need not take further action.”

Read more from this Tulsa World article at http://www.tulsaworld.com/business/article.aspx?subjectid=316&articleid=20120108_15_E2_erAtoi466697

This is a great piece and highlights your right in bankruptcy and the promise of a fresh start.

 

Posted in Bankruptcy | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Friendly Wins Approval of Sale, Sun Capital Retains Ownership

This is a great article and Friendly Restaurants and ice cream are a New England tradition. I look forward to the bankruptcy helping them more forward.

By Michael Bathon

Dec. 29 (Bloomberg) — Friendly Ice Cream Corp., the 76- year-old restaurant chain, won court approval to sell the business, allowing it to be retained by its current owner, private-equity firm Sun Capital Partners Inc.

U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Kevin Gross approved the sale at a hearing today in Wilmington, Delaware, according to court documents. Friendly canceled its proposed Dec. 22 bankruptcy auction after it didn’t receive any qualified bids to compete with Sun Capital.

Sun Capital, based in Boca Raton, Florida, will pay about $75 million and retain ownership through a unit while allowing the Friendly’s chain to shed debt.

Friendly, which opened in 1935 with one shop in Springfield, Massachusetts, sought bankruptcy protection in October citing the struggling economy and rising commodity costs. Debt was listed at about $297 million and assets were valued at more than $100 million, according to court documents.

The Wilbraham, Massachusetts-based company, known as “Friendly’s,” closed 63 sites as part of the bankruptcy filing. Another 424 locations will stay open, Friendly said.

The case is In re Friendly Ice Cream Corp., 11-13167, U.S. Bankruptcy Court, District of Delaware (Wilmington).

–Editors: Peter Blumberg, Michael Hytha

To contact the reporter on this story: Michael Bathon in Wilmington, Delaware, at mbathon@bloomberg.net.

To contact the editor responsible for this story: John Pickering at jpickering@bloomberg.net.

Bankruptcy can be a very difficult decision – you should not have to face it alone. Contact us today for assistance. We will provide you with a free initial consultation at which time we will discuss your circumstances and recommend a solid course of action. If you are considering bankruptcy – call the Law Office of Brian R Lewis today 508-946-3323 or visit www.mabklawyer.com

Posted in Bankruptcy | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Bankruptcy no guarantee of success, either for business or individuals

The ink was barely dry on the bankruptcy filing of AMR Corp., the parent company of American Airlines, when Chris in Tulsa wondered “why companies can get away with things that individuals can’t.”

“If I try to walk away from my debts and my creditors, everything in my life would be (messed) up for a long time,” he said in an email. “I don’t understand why the system lets companies simply start over. … I want a do-over.”

Read more from this Tulsa World article at http://www.tulsaworld.com/business/article.aspx?subjectid=51&articleid=20111207_46_E4_Theink633752

Comments by Law Office of Brian R Lewis:

This is a good article and highlight the reason for a good bankruptcy lawyer and credit counsiling. If you are overwhelmed with debt and need to discuss your options please give us a call or visit www.mabklawyer.com

Posted in Bankruptcy | Tagged , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Bank subsidiary to pay $52M in mortgage case settlement

By Donna Goodison And Jerry Kronenberg

Royal Bank of Scotland subsidiary has agreed to pay $52 million to settle charges that it traded more than 700 “presumptively unfair” sub-prime mortgages given to Massachusetts homeowners during the housing boom.

The payment will settle allegations that RBS Financial Products Inc., formerly known as Greenwich Capital Financial Products Inc., financed, purchased and scrutinized residential loans that were unfair under Massachusetts law.

More than 700 Massachusetts homeowners will benefit from the settlement, according to state Attorney General Martha Coakley.

The RBS case is the third securitization-related action brought by Coakley against investment firms following an investigation of their practices in the wake of the recent economic collapse. Her office previously targeted Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley to recover a total of $200 million-plus in settlements.

“The securitization of sub-prime loans by investment banks is a major cause of the economic crisis,” said Coakley. “Investment banks profited handsomely from those securitizations at the expense of homeowners. The only way we are going to return to a healthy economy is to hold these banks accountable in order to achieve real relief for homeowners.”

Under the terms of the settlement filed in Suffolk Superior Court today, upward of $40.2 million of the settlement will go toward principal loan reduction and other relief for more than 700 Massachusetts sub-prime borrowers. Those borrowers’ loans were scrutinized by RBS in 2006 and 2007 and primarily were so-called “ARM” loans with low introductory interest rates and high debt-to-income and loan-to-value ratios, according to Coakley’s office.

The settlement also includes a $8.9 million-plus payment to the state and approximately $2.6 million that will be used to compensate municipalities most affected by foreclosures of the RBS-securitized loans.

Coakley’s office plans to notify consumers covered by the settlement in the next few months.

Comment From the Law Office of Brian R Lewis:

It is good to see the lenders held accountable for deceptive lending practices but for many home owner this is too late. If you are behind on your mortgage or being threaten with foreclosure, there are options, give us a call or visit www.mabklawyer.com we can help.

 

Posted in Foreclosure | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Foreclosure Rate Climbs Again in Massachusetts

Foreclosure rate climbs again in Massachusetts

By Jon Chesto

The Patriot Ledger

For the first time in more than a year in Massachusetts, the foreclosure rate headed upward again when compared to the same month in the prior year.

The Warren Group reported that lenders and mortgage servicers filed 1,193 initial petitions to foreclose last month, a 5.9-percent increase from the number of petitions that were filed in October 2010. Meanwhile, 756 foreclosure deeds were recorded last month, a 35.7-percent increase from October 2010.

“We went through a time in the summer where it slowed down a bit, and we were hopeful (but) now it does seem to be picking back up again,” said Carolyn Sheppard, housing program director at Quincy Community Action Programs Inc.

Sheppard attributed the spike to the weak economy.

“We’re seeing more people who got into regular mortgages who now aren’t able to afford it because their unemployment benefits are running out,” Shepphard said. “Often their house is underwater, so even if they try to refinance, they owe more than the home is worth.”

Tim Warren, CEO of the Boston-based Warren Group, said this was the first time since September 2010 that the number of monthly foreclosures rose, year-over-year. He also said it was the first time since August 2010 that the number of monthly petitions rose from the same month in the prior year.

Warren said the increase was partly caused by the slowdown in foreclosures that happened at this time last year. Warren pointed to a state law that took effect in August 2010 that required lenders to give borrowers 150 days to address a mortgage default before moving ahead with a foreclosure. Before that law, the state required a 90-day waiting period.

Warren said it could take at least another two years before foreclosures return to normal levels in this state. But he said the problem is much worse in other states where there was a considerable amount of speculative residential construction.

Aaron Gornstein, executive director of the Citizens’ Housing and Planning Association in Boston, said much of the legal uncertainty that caused banks to move cautiously with foreclosures has been resolved. He also said many lenders are deciding that the borrowers won’t be able to catch up with the requisite payments and are giving up on efforts to make permanent modifications to defaulted loans.

“It’s certainly not good news because we think it’s going to lead to (dumping) more properties on the market,” Gornstein said. “It’s important to get these properties reoccupied as quickly as possible and to make sure they don’t become an eyesore or a nuisance.”

Read more: http://www.patriotledger.com/business/x1514730476/Foreclosure-rate-climbs-again-in-Massachusetts#ixzz1fDrZZDkR

Comment From the Law Office of Brian R Lewis:

No one wants to lose their home or ever intended to get into the position they might. You may feel like there are no options but many times a Chapter 13 Bankruptcy will help you keep your home and give you a fresh start debt free. If you would like to discuss your options and stop the foreclosure please call us 508-946-3323.

Posted in Foreclosure | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

The Foreclosure Crisis in Massachusetts

Boston, MA (MMD Newswire) October 21, 2011 – -The foreclosure crisis in Massachusetts and elsewhere in the USA is a complicated issue governed by a variety of self-interests. These are being played out at the emotional and financial expense of those with the greatest need. In August of this year, Massachusetts posted an alarming, single month jump in foreclosed homes, topping 900 units. This figure does not even begin to measure the total impact on the lives of families and communities. Massachusetts laws protect renters, only until foreclosed properties are sold, then they too are subject to legal eviction.

Nationally, the data shows a 14% increase in default notices during the 3rd quarter of the year from July to September. Although not all defaults result in foreclosures, this trend indicates that we’re far from being out of the woods.

 The untold story is that tens of thousands of lawyers and their staffs are making a financial killing repossessing homes on behalf of their lender clients. Lobbyists representing the foreclosure industry lawyers have been continuously pushing Washington hard and fast to maintain a hands-off position. The other strong lobbying group is the National Board of Realtors that has been equally effective in forcing Congress to do nothing. In fact, Realtors are encouraged to attend classes to take full advantage of, what they typically refer to as REO (real estate owned), short-sales and foreclosures. And finally, we have the lobbyists for the banking industry. As you no doubt recall, they were among those that that benefited greatly from the infamous taxpayer funded TARP bailed-out. Needless to say, they’ve shown that they learned nothing from the precepts imparted in the Gospel’s tale of the unforgiving servant and, as such, have done nothing to demonstrate their willingness to pay it forward by making life easier for their clients that find themselves in a tough spot.

 By now, every American should have a clear realization of what’s really going and, not surprisingly, it turns out to be much of what has fueled and is at the core of the Occupy Wall Street movements.

 Remarkably, a large part of the justification for maintaining the status quo is that far too many people have jobs feeding off the foreclosure industry and stopping it would create more unemployment. All one needs to consider, when repudiating such claims, is the simple fact that the economy was on significantly better footing when the housing market was doing well. The financial collapse had its roots in the housing sector. Therefore, the logical conclusion should be that a strong housing market would contribute to a rapid improvement that would reach a broad spectrum of the economy.

 Given that I hold both a Massachusetts Real Estate license and a Massachusetts Construction Supervisor’s license, I am very familiar with both sides of the equation. It is from this background that I propose the legislative changes that follow. The nuts and bolts of such a measure would have to be hammered out by committee, but the essence of the bill is spelled out below and provides meaningful reforms that protect the interests of both homeowners and lenders while at the same time providing a jumping off point to repair our badly damaged economy.

 

- HOMEOWNER’S FORECLOSURE PROTECTION ACT:

 1. Immediate moratorium on all foreclosure activity relating to owner-occupied homes, including owner-occupied multi-family dwellings. Investment and/or commercial and abandoned/vacant properties would not be subject to the provisions of the Act.

 2. Personal bankruptcies that fail to reaffirm the owner-occupied home loan are also exempt from the provisions of the Act.

 3. Recently unemployed homeowners must notify their lender within 30 days of unemployment.

 4. Homeowners have 90 days to show proof of unemployment or underemployment and an inability to make their current mortgage payments.

 5. Homeowners unemployed prior to the Act have 90 days from its inception to show proof of unemployment or underemployment and an inability to make their current mortgage payments.

 6. Failure to provide requested documentation or failure to provide sufficient evidence to indicate financial hardship in the specified time and manner shall nullify the foreclosure stop action.

 7. Arrearage, the amount past due, would be moved to the back of the loan, without additional interest or penalty.

 8. Lender would provide, without regard to homeowner credit worthiness (credit scores), their lowest possible interest rate and, if necessary, would further temporarily lower mortgage payments to not exceed 28% of the homeowners gross income for a period of up to 36 months. Homeowners must remain current with their local property tax obligations and homeowner’s insurance.

 9. Homeowners, at their discretion, may seek an independent property appraisal and the lender must rewrite the loan (loan modification) based on an agreed upon current value.

 10. During the 36 month provisions of the Act, homeowners must update their income status every six months. Lenders are obligated to adjust accordingly (up or down), the monthly mortgage payments, to reflect the required 28% payment to mortgage ratio.

 11. Homeowners are free to sell the home at any time. However, if the ultimate selling price exceeds the original mortgage amount, after all fees, the lender is entitled to full repayment of the original loan amount.

 12. Lender may not report loan modification as an adverse action to credit bureaus.

 13. The Act includes modification of the tax code to eliminate the treatment of forgiven debt as taxable income to the homeowner in cases relating to home refinancing, loan modifications, short sales or foreclosures. However, lenders may continue to benefit from being able to right-off the entire cost associated with any such loan modifications.

 

- THE RESULTS:

 1. Stabilizing the housing market is an important stepping stone towards an overall sustainable economic recovery. By stopping foreclosures, we immediately put a halt to the downward pressure on home prices.

 2. The devastated home construction industry can once again begin to build as a result of the reduction in excess inventories and increased demand. With a vibrant construction industry, comes increased spending on building materials, tools, trucks, vans, etc. Architects begin designing new homes, builders begin to hire carpenters along with a whole slew of sub-contractors, such as plumbers, electricians, and roofers, etc. In turn, their families will have money to spend and grow the economy and create even more jobs in every sector.

 3. Cities and States will realize increased tax revenues resulting from increased taxable incomes and sales taxes. We can then afford to appropriately pay our teachers, repair our schools and give our first responders competitive wages and provide them with the tools and equipment that keeps them safe, while they put their lives on the line for us every day.

 4. Neighborhoods will no longer be littered with unsightly abandoned homes that attract vandalism and further depress neighborhood home values.

 5. But what of the professional foreclosure lawyers, their staffs and the real estate agents that were dependent on a steady stream of delinquent properties? Fortunately for them, they too will benefit from the protections afforded to them by the Act. The 3 year window should be more than adequate to allow them to hone their skills in other related areas.

 6. For the lenders, the cost to slow down mortgage repayments, modify loans to reflect current market values, including lower interest rates, has to be less costly than what they would otherwise pay in legal fees to foreclosure lawyers, title companies, appraisers, and real estate agents. In addition, foreclosed properties are typically sold off for 10% to 20% below fair market value. And let’s not forget the property maintenance costs associated with maintaining vacant foreclosed homes. Current data indicates foreclosed homes linger on the market for an average of 336 days and the costs of maintenance on these vacant foreclosed homes can quickly add up.

 7. Even if all you care about is looking strictly at the numbers, history and the overwhelming unemployment figures prove that there are far more jobs of every kind created with a healthy housing market. There is no credible rationale that would allow this injustice to continue.

 Washington lobbyists, with the full collaboration of our politicians, continue to ignore the plight of those in need in favor of those in greed. With national elections a year away, we need to demand immediate short-term solutions of our elected officials. If you agree with my proposal, I urge you to write your elected officials and include a copy of this document.

 Bill Cimbrelo, chemist, businessman and entrepreneur is an Independent candidate for U.S. Senator of Massachusetts. He is the creator of www.jobaction.org, a free online job board and forum designed to promote the formation of collaborative and co-ops to help put people back to work.

From The Law Office of Brian R Lewis: As a Law Firm you do not publicly support and candidate but we found this article interesting and informative. If you need help staying in your home and stopping forclosure please give us a call. Our experienced attorneys can discuss your situation and help you understand your options.

Posted in Foreclosure | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Credit Card Debt Rise Alarming

 

Credit Card Debt

Credit card debt cases are accelerated as we over leverage ourselves and live beyond our means. A continuous rise in the default cases is in turn weakening the complete financial system. The problem seems similar to the mortgages gone bad dilemma. People are lagging behind in their credit card payments, number of defaulters is rising, and the loan amount payments are getting larger.

Outstanding credit card debt which is posing a great threat for the financial institutions has amounted to $772 billion and this is a rather large reason to worry. The collective credit card debt in 2011 is expected to increase by $54 billion. Back in 2010, the addition to the new credit card debt was only $9 million whereas in 2009, credit card debt had seen a reduction.

In the first quarter of 2011, $18 billion was added to the credit card debt. Other than this the economy is facing a burden of $1.7 trillion from other debt like mortgages.

This news can be really bad for big credit card players like Bank of America and JPMorgan chase. The debt burden is already spreading its ill effects on the US financial markets thereby further weakening the economy.

The Federal Reserve data on credit card debt shows a higher increase. According to Mr Papadimitriou, the figures are misleading as they have not taken into account the credit-card issuers charge off. According to him, if the debt trend sees similar rise, then banks will have to sit back with heaps of bad debts and ordinary people will still continue borrowing more than their ability to repay.

Written by Fred Wilder Credit Card Debt Rise Alarming

Debt can take over your life. The never ending phone calls and letters can make the stress overwhelming. You can have a fresh start , no more nasty calls or letters and no more debt. Call the Law Offices of Brian Lewis, we can help today.

Posted in Personal Debt | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Foreclosed Homes Touches New Heights in Massachusetts in 2011

Monday, October 3rd, 2011

 Foreclosed Homes Touches New Heights in Massachusetts in 2011

 The number of foreclosed homes has set new records in August, 2011 in Massachusetts. There were 900 foreclosure processes completed in the month.

 According to the Warren Group report on foreclosures, the activity has seen an upward trend starting from the month of November last year.

 The number of completed foreclosure deeds is lesser in percentage when compared to the last year’s data. There were 22% more foreclosures in the month of August in 2010. However the ratio is narrowing down.

The slowdown in the deeds this year was partly because of the big lenders taking a cautious approach after the robo-signing scandal that came up last year. The lender and owner now ensure they have proper documents before they foreclose a property.

Managing Editor of The Warren Group’s Banker and Tradesman newspaper, Cory Hopkins said, after the banks have set in the proper foreclosure procedure they will work on the foreclosure backlogs. Therefore, the rate of completed foreclose procedures will far lead the number of last year’s foreclosures.

 Callahan added, despite the loan delinquencies trending down there will be numerous foreclosed homes haunting neighborhoods for a couple more years.

 This is another great article by Fred Wilder

Comment on the article: Foreclosure in many cases can be stopped, you need to contact an attorney experienced in handling personal debt and stopping foreclosure. An attorney can review the options that are available to your so you can decide the best course of action.

Posted in Foreclosure | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Foreclosure Accord Liability Releases Draw Resistance From Three States

Foreclosure Accord Liability Releases Draw Resistance From Three States

7/28/11

Three states conducting their own probes of residential mortgage practices are resisting broad liability releases sought by banks to settle a nationwide foreclosure investigation.

The banks, in settlement talks with state and federal officials, are seeking releases that would protect them from future legal liabilities. Massachusetts Attorney General Martha Coakley said yesterday she won’t endorse a deal that includes certain releases. New York and Delaware have raised similar concerns over terms of a possible deal.

All three states are conducting investigations tied to mortgage operations of banks. Delaware and Massachusetts officials say a settlement shouldn’t release banks from some claims, including those related to bundling mortgages into securities, while the inquiries continue.

“We’re not prepared to do a broad liability release for either securitization issues or for MERS until we’ve completed that piece of investigation,” Coakley said in a telephone interview yesterday. Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems Inc., or MERS, is a national mortgage database used by banks.

State and federal officials are negotiating a settlement with the five largest mortgage servicers, including Bank of America Corp. (BAC) and JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM), over their servicing and foreclosure practices. Attorneys general from all 50 states began investigating the practices last year.

Banks’ Goal

The banks want releases that go beyond servicing to include lending and securitization of loans, according to a person familiar with the matter.

Lawrence Grayson, a spokesmen for Bank of America, and Thomas Kelly of JPMorgan declined to comment about the issue last week. They didn’t respond today to e-mails seeking comment.

New York Attorney General Eric T. Schneiderman’s office said in a statement last week that he “remains concerned by any settlement agreement that would preclude state attorneys general from conducting comprehensive investigations of the mortgage crisis.”

Delaware Attorney General Beau Biden said in an interview last week that he had “strong reservations” about releasing claims other than for servicing of mortgages because he is investigating related issues, including securitization.

“We have an investigation going on,” Biden said. “It would hinder our ability to do that, so that’s why I have real reservations about anything beyond releases as it relates to servicing.”

Delaware Probe

Delaware is also investigating MERS, according to a person familiar with the matter.

MERS was created by the mortgage finance industry and tracks servicing and ownership interests in mortgage loans. Coakley said she is investigating whether MERS complies with Massachusetts law. At issue is the integrity of real-estate transfers, she said.

In proposed settlement terms sent to the banks in March, state and federal officials said “issues relating to the use and performance of MERS are reserved for further discussion.”

Eric Tabor, chief of staff for Iowa Attorney General Tom Miller, declined to comment about negotiations over MERS. Miller is leading negotiations for the states.

Scope of Liability

States besides New York, Delaware and Massachusetts have concerns about the scope of the liability releases in any settlement with mortgage servicers, Coakley said. She declined to name the states. Banks are looking for the broadest releases possible in any settlement, Coakley said, and the issue is “under intense discussion.”

Merscorp Inc., which owns MERS, will cooperate with the investigations by Massachusetts and Delaware, Janis Smith, vice president of corporate communications, said in an e-mailed statement.

“The use of MERS has been litigated in Massachusetts courts, and judges have upheld the legality of the MERS business model in the commonwealth,” Smith said.

Coakley said she disagreed with that view.

To contact the reporter on this story: David McLaughlin in New York at

dmclaughlin9@bloomberg.net.

Bankruptcy can be a difficult decision, and you should not have to face it alone. If you contact us for assistance, we will provide you with a free initial consultation, during which time we will discuss your circumstances and recommend a course of action. If you are considering bankruptcy, call the Law Office of Brian R Lewis today!

Posted in Foreclosure | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment